● PROTOTYPE · NOT THE BUILT PRODUCT built from Partner Networks spec
Prototype data · switch organization with Viewing as

Partner Networks

Round 7 — In Development · Partner Networks only (Decision 21)

Round 7 — In Development · not reviewed
About this prototype

Round 7 builds on round 6 (the October 13 review and spec v0.16, with the changes through October 20) as Partner Networks only: Create network opens the Partner Network form directly, and the Networks page and its map list partner networks only. Round 7 is in development and not yet reviewed by GIK. It started from round 6’s Partner-Networks-only exploration after GIK removed private networks (October 21 Dev Sync, Decision 21, spec v0.17), and now takes in GIK’s October 26 revisions (spec v0.18 in PR #198, not yet merged into main, and the Release 1 scope of the same day): Create network, then Add organizations (skippable), then the Overview with Add event leading; email invitations by address only; picking organizations from previous networks; one Overview layout after Shabab Gruberg’s whiteboard, with its main action by organization type; needs with one progress bar and Respond (Decision 22); the map with grouped markers and a need’s drawer (Decision 26); the current event kept per organization; an event’s page as the Overview focused on it (Decision 28). Impact and delivery routes are not in Release 1 and are not shown. Round 6, with both of its files, stays available in the Explorer.The screens carry no status labels. In the review notes: Release 1 or answered by GIK is confirmed (spec v0.18 in PR #198, not yet merged into main; the October 26 Release 1 scope); estimating default is what the Release 1 estimate assumes until GIK or Mike Perry confirms it; ▲ marks an open decision or a difference from v0.18; UX proposal is Augusto’s, not in v0.18; Later is outside Release 1; History is an earlier round’s note kept for context.

How to use it. Choose a page, then one of its example states. More detailed scenarios are reached through the prototype itself, or by their direct links. Each example is a preset: a fixed sample state for review that never changes your session. Return to your session to use the prototype live, as the organization chosen in Viewing as. Review notes for each example are below the prototype window.

Preset example · demo data, kept apart from your session · · Return to your sessionLive session · your actions are kept until you reset

About this session

Viewing as changes whose perspective you see; it never creates, accepts or shares anything. Clicking the prototype’s own buttons (Create, Send, Accept, Share and so on) changes this session, and it is kept across pages until you reset it. Reset session clears it and starts again from the sample data.

Preset examples never read or change your session. In an example you can search, filter, open previews and move between the network’s Overview, Resources and Members; actions such as Send, Accept, Share and Create only run in your session.

Organization type describes an organization; capabilities and its relationship to each network decide what it is offered. All organizations and records are prototype data.

How to read the review notes
  • Settled: the signed Q4 roadmap’s text, or a decision the spec records as settled, with who and when.
  • First release: in Augusto’s proposed first release (spec section 4). GIK has not agreed to it.
  • Working decision: answered internally in the 2026-10-07 decision interview with Mike Perry. Not confirmed by GIK; a model that implements it is not approval.
  • Working internal direction: from the 2026-10-07 internal review of round 2 (Brian, Simon, Mike), filed as a raw feedback note. Requested design direction, not a numbered decision and not GIK approval.
  • Prototype refinement: a layout or information-architecture change made in the prototype to test usability, such as where a step lives. Not a GIK requirement and not a decision.
  • ▲ Decision pending: still open, with GIK (Shabab, George) or with engineering (Mike).
  • ▲ Conflict: repo sources disagree. The note says what is drawn and why; nothing is resolved here.
  • R5 proposal: added in round 5 for review, often after Brian Anderson’s round 4.5. Not a decision and not GIK approval.
  • Model: ERD round 1 and the ontology’s networks module, proposed and not built. Gap: in the repo, not drawn yet. Later: outside this round.

Prototype data: illustrative organizations, networks and records, in browser-tab state; nothing is sent, saved or shared. Reset session clears it.